Has the Daily Mail gone too far this time?

Lizzie Roberts asks if the Daily Mail’s character assassination of Ralph Miliband is hard-nosed journalism, or a crass witch hunt.

This weekend the Daily Mail published a smear campaign against Labour leader Ed Miliband’s father, Ralph Miliband. The tabloid obtained the now deceased Mr Miliband’s diary from when he was 17, and plastered him as a Marxist, someone who hated Great Britain and claimed that those who love our country should be “disturbed.”  The Labour leader has retaliated with his own piece about how much his father loved this country; however the Daily Mail have stated they are “refusing to apologise.” Is this character assassination of a politician gone too far?

Put aside whether you like or dislike Ed Miliband as a leader, a politician or even a person. Whether you like or dislike Labour, their policies or the party. As a collective we can all agree that publicly attacking a man’s family, especially his father who passed away nearly 20 years ago, has no place in politics and no place in the national press?

The recent “Hacked Off” campaign championed by the likes of Hugh Grant and other notable public figures, as well as the recent infamous Leveson inquiry, highlighted the need for a free and accountable press in the UK. The press has been under immense scrutiny for this style of “investigative journalism” since the inquiry. The argument put forward by the Mail and otRalph_Miliband_in_1958her papers when controversial articles such as these are published is “it is in the public’s interest.” However I am not sure what Ralph Miliband’s diary, from when he was 17, has to do with me or anyone for that matter. The Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg put it perfectly when he tweeted, “Politics should be about playing the ball, not the man, certainly not the man’s family.”

It cannot be denied the press is a crucial part of an open democracy and the attempts to restrict it is a risky business. However, for how long will it be acceptable for this form of journalism to carry on, from hacking phones, dangerously chasing celebrities for pictures and claiming rights to photograph their children and now smearing politician’s families. None of these things are in the public interest.

In the last week an Anti-Paparazzi act was been brought into law in California. Backed by Halle Berry and Jennifer Garner, the law is set to curtail paparazzi photographing the children of prominent people without permission. This is not restricting the press, freedom of speech or information, but protecting those who have the right to their privacy. Why can’t the UK follow suit?

The most astonishing part of this smear campaign against Ralph Miliband is the fanciful argument that he hated Britain. Mr Miliband fled Belgium and the Nazi occupation at the age of 16, found salvation in Britain and went on to join the navy, fight in the war and become a D-Day veteran. It is astonishing that the Daily Mail is brandishing him as loathing Britain when he served and loved it.

Furthermore, quite a stir has been created on the social media with many people disgusted with the Paper’s actions and even finding the paper quite hypocritical. The article accuses Ralph Miliband of being a Communist and having extreme views. However, they seem to have forgotten their own past. During the 1930s Lord Rothermere, the Chairman of the Daily Mail at the time, was well-known as a good friend of Mussolini and Hitler and was even known to of praised the Nazi regime. Moreover, the paper supported the actions of Oswald Mosley the leader of the British U715px-Daily_Mail_clock,_closeupnion of Fascists, who took some ground during the 1930s as Britain’s only extreme right-wing fascist party.

Ed Miliband’s response to the article is a very touching tribute to the life of his father; how he came to Britain leaving his mother and sister in hiding in Belgium, and built a life here with his father and went on to serve his “adopted” country. The Labour leader goes on to state he is open to any scrutiny by the press of himself as a politician, it comes with the job, but a character assassination of his father has no place in the media.

The Mail has since responded with “Today, we stand by every word we published on Saturday, from the headline to our assertion that the beliefs of Miliband Snr ‘should disturb everyone who loves this country.” It makes no attempt to apologise or retract any of its distasteful comments about Mr Miliband’s dead father but instead pushes their defamation further. The article ends stating Ed Miliband is determined to control the freedom of the press and if he achieves this “no doubt his father will be proud of him from beyond the grave, where he lies 12 yards from the remains of Karl Marx.”

This excessive, personal, and unwarranted slating of Ralph Miliband shows the true nature of the Daily Mail, furthermore their response to a heartfelt reply from the Labour leader shows their inability to accept that they have made a mistake. More needs to be done to ensure the press is actually pursuing journalism in the “public interest” and not attempting to smear politician’s families in an effort to smear the politician himself.

Lizzie is a second year History and Politics student at Lancaster University, with a strong passion for American politics, equality and good old British sarcasm.


  1. ‘Twas dacre, and the slithy toves
    Did moir and platell in the wabe;
    All mooney were the michael goves,
    And the harmsworths outgrabe.

    “Beware Lord Rothermere, my son!
    The kays that bite, the vines that catch!
    Beware the little john, and shun
    That melanie’s Bandersnatch!”

    He took ralph milliband in hand:
    Long time the ephraim foe he sought—
    So rested he by the porter tree,
    And stood awhile in thought.

    And as in heffer letts he stood,
    Lord Rothermere, with eyes of flame,
    Came hitchens through the utley wood,
    And brummered as it came!

    One, two! One, two! and through and through
    Ed milliband went snicker-snack!
    He left it dead, and with its head
    He went galumphing back.

    “And hast thou slain Lord Rothermere?
    Come to my arms, my bamig boye!
    O black dog day! Forsyth! Mckay!”
    He chortled in his joy.

    ‘Twas dacre, and the slithy toves
    Did moir and platell in the wabe;
    All mooney were the michael goves,
    And the harmsworths outgrabe.

  2. To be honest, it’s really no different from the Guardian claiming that DC hates the disabled and wishes them dead etc when both his father and son were disabled.

    It’s definitely tasetless journalism, but by no means should press freedoms be curtailed to prevent this type of story. Libel law exists for a reason.

    • i dont think the press should be curtailed necessarily. but i think what they wrote its disgusting and wasnt news that the public needed to know. i think theres a line and they crossed it.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here